When it comes to container orchestration, Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers two prominent solutions: Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). This comprehensive comparison unravels the key differences between these two platforms - EKS and ECS. 

ECS vs eks, EKS vs ECS, Amazon EKS vs ECS, AWS ECS vs EKS, AMAZON EKS VS ECS banner

Containerization has emerged as a game-changing technology. Amazon Web Services (AWS), a pioneer in the field, offers two popular container orchestration services: Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). 

These platforms have revolutionized how applications are deployed, managed, and scaled in the cloud. 

In this blog, we will dive deep into the technical realms of ECS and EKS, uncovering their unique capabilities, architectural nuances, and operational disparities. 

So join us on this thrilling journey as we unravel the key differences between Amazon ECS and EKS, and help you determine which is best suited for your containerization needs.

What is Amazon ECS?

Amazon ECS is a fully-managed container orchestration service that simplifies the process of running and scaling containers in the cloud. 

Think of AWS ECS as a master conductor, orchestrating an ensemble of containers, ensuring they work harmoniously to deliver your applications.

But what makes ECS stand out from the crowd? 

One word: simplicity. 

With ECS, you can wave goodbye to the complexities of managing infrastructure and focus solely on your applications. 

It handles all the heavy lifting, from provisioning resources to load balancing, allowing you to soar higher and faster toward your goals.

What is Amazon EKS?

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) is a fully-managed container orchestration service that Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of Kubernetes clusters in the cloud. 

EKS seamlessly integrates with the popular open-source Kubernetes ecosystem, providing developers and businesses with a robust platform to automate containerized application deployments, scaling, and management. 

With EKS, users can leverage the advanced features of Kubernetes while benefiting from the scalability, security, and tight integration with other AWS services.

What is AWS Fargate?

AWS Fargate, a revolutionary service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS), introduces a new paradigm in containerization by enabling serverless execution of containers. 

It liberates developers and businesses from the burden of managing the underlying infrastructure, allowing them to focus solely on their applications.

AWS Fargate is a fully managed compute engine that seamlessly integrates with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). 

It eliminates the need for users to provision and manage virtual machines or clusters, as Fargate takes care of all the underlying infrastructure required to run containers at scale.

Also Read: Docker Commands Complete Cheat Sheet

What are the Similarities between AWS EKS and ECS?

Scalability and Elasticity

EKS and ECS deliver scalability and elasticity to your containerized applications. Whether you choose Kubernetes-powered EKS or the Docker-centric ECS, you can scale your applications seamlessly based on demand. 

Both services enable you to automatically provision resources, add or remove containers dynamically, and easily handle spikes in workload. 

With EKS and ECS, your applications can gracefully adapt to fluctuating traffic and ensure optimal performance without manual intervention.

Also Read: How to Migrate from AWS to Azure?

Integration with AWS Services

Another shared strength between EKS and ECS lies in their seamless integration with other AWS services. 

Whether leveraging Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for secure access control, or AWS Elastic Load Balancer for distributing traffic, both services offer a rich ecosystem of integrations. 

This integration allows you to use additional AWS services and build comprehensive, end-to-end solutions that extend beyond container orchestration.

High Availability and Fault Tolerance

EKS and ECS prioritize high availability and fault tolerance to ensure the reliability of your containerized applications. 

They both provide mechanisms to distribute containers across multiple Availability Zones, protecting your applications from single points of failure. 

Additionally, both services offer auto-scaling, load balancing, and health checks to ensure your containers are always accessible and your applications can gracefully handle failures.

Security and Compliance

Security is a top priority for AWS, and both EKS and ECS share a strong focus on providing robust security features. 

They integrate seamlessly with AWS security services, allowing you to enforce access controls, implement encryption, and secure network traffic. 

Whether you are concerned about protecting sensitive data or ensuring compliance with industry regulations, both EKS and ECS offer a range of security measures to give you peace of mind.

Humalect CTA, ECS vs EKS, EKS vs ECS

Ease of Management

While EKS and ECS have unique management interfaces, they are committed to providing a user-friendly experience. Both services offer intuitive management consoles, command-line interfaces (CLI), and APIs for interacting with and managing containerized applications. 

Whether you're a Kubernetes enthusiast or prefer a more streamlined approach, EKS, and ECS strive to make container orchestration accessible and manageable for developers and operations teams.

Also Read: A Complete List of Kubectl Commands

How do ECS and EKS Work?

ECS operates by utilizing Docker containers as the building blocks for applications. It functions as a centralized conductor, orchestrating these containers' deployment, scaling, and management. 

ECS manages a cluster of computing resources and ensures that containers are assigned to the appropriate servers based on resource availability and optimization. 

It monitors container health, automatically restarts failed instances, and gracefully handles scaling demands to maintain optimal performance. 

ECS acts as the backbone, seamlessly coordinating the diverse components of your containerized applications.

In contrast, EKS embraces the power of Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration system. 

EKS transforms your cluster into a vibrant dance floor where containers gracefully perform tasks. 

Kubernetes expertly manages these containers, organizing them into pods—a cohesive group that works closely together. It dynamically assigns pods to available servers, distributing the workload efficiently. 

EKS ensures high availability by scheduling pods across multiple Availability Zones, safeguarding against failures. 

It constantly monitors the health of containers and performs automated restarts to maintain application stability. 

Also Read: Best Practices for Kubernetes Security, Namespace, and More

EKS vs ECS - Features

Both ECS and EKS offer similar features, such as support for auto-scaling, rolling updates, self-healing, and integration with other AWS services. 

With auto-scaling, both services enable the dynamic adjustment of resources to handle varying workloads. 

Rolling updates ensure seamless application updates without downtime. 

Self-healing capabilities automatically restart failed containers or pods to maintain application availability. 

Additionally, both ECS and EKS seamlessly integrate with various AWS services, expanding their functionality and enabling comprehensive solutions. 

However, EKS boasts an additional feature—the native support for the Kubernetes API. 

This makes EKS a favorable choice for users with existing Kubernetes workloads, simplifying the migration process and providing a familiar interface for managing and scaling applications.

ECS vs EKS Pricing - Cost Comparison

ECS and EKS follow similar pricing structures, but a few nuances exist to consider. 

EKS tends to be slightly more expensive than ECS but offers additional features that may justify the extra cost. 

EKS comprises a control plane and infrastructure, AWS Fargate or Amazon EC2, to run containerized applications. 

The cost of both ECS and EKS depends on the infrastructure choice (AWS Fargate or Amazon EC2) for hosting the containers.

For EKS, there is an hourly charge of $0.10 per Amazon EKS cluster to cover the cost of the control plane. 

This fee is separate from the infrastructure costs and contributes to the management and maintenance of the EKS control plane.

Also Read: ELK vs SPLUNK

Amazon ECS vs EKS - Networking

In the case of EKS, each instance can host a larger number of Pods. With EKS, you can have up to 750 Pods per instance. 

This flexibility allows for greater density and scalability, enabling you to efficiently utilize the resources of your instances. 

EKS empowers you to run multiple containers within each Pod, optimizing resource allocation and streamlining your application architecture.

On the other hand, ECS has a lower limit for the maximum number of tasks that can reside on a single instance. 

ECS allows for a maximum of 120 tasks per instance. This restriction means that each instance can host a smaller number of containers compared to EKS. 

However, it's important to note that ECS offers the ability to have multiple containers per task, allowing for more granular control and flexibility in managing your applications.

EKS vs. ECS - Cluster Management

Regarding cluster management, ECS simplifies the process by handling the infrastructure for you, allowing you to create and manage clusters effortlessly. It provides a seamless experience, enabling easy scaling, monitoring, and automation. 

On the other hand, EKS leverages the power of Kubernetes, abstracting away infrastructure complexities and offering access to Kubernetes' robust cluster management capabilities. It suits those who prefer Kubernetes's flexibility and extensive ecosystem for their containerized environments.

Also Read: Differences between EBS vs EFS vs S3

AWS ECS vs EKS - Scalability

Scalability is a critical factor when comparing Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS. ECS and EKS offer robust scalability options, allowing you to handle varying workload demands effectively. 

With ECS, you can easily scale your containers horizontally by adding or removing tasks dynamically based on demand. 

ECS integrates seamlessly with AWS Auto Scaling, enabling automated scaling based on predefined rules. 

On the other hand, EKS leverages the power of Kubernetes to provide horizontal scalability. Kubernetes allows you to scale your application by adjusting the number of pods that manage the containers. 

Whether you choose ECS or EKS, you can confidently scale your containerized applications to meet the evolving needs of your business, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization.

State of Containerization in EKS and ECS

Containerization has revolutionized the way applications are deployed and managed. Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) have played pivotal roles in driving the state of containerization forward. 

EKS, built on the powerful Kubernetes platform, has established itself as a go-to solution for organizations embracing the benefits of container orchestration. 

With EKS, users can leverage Kubernetes's extensive features and ecosystem, enabling advanced container management, scaling, and deployment strategies

On the other hand, ECS, with its fully managed container service, provides a simplified yet robust solution for running containers at scale. 

ECS offers flexibility in the choice of orchestrators, including its native orchestrator, and seamlessly integrates with other AWS services. 

Together, EKS and ECS have contributed to the widespread adoption of containerization, empowering organizations to harness containerized applications' agility, scalability, and efficiency in their digital transformation journeys.

ECS vs EKS: Ease of Use 

ECS is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward, making it easy to understand and utilize without requiring extensive knowledge or experience. 

It provides a simplified and intuitive interface for managing containers, abstracting away some of the complexities associated with container orchestration. 

On the other hand, EKS relies on Kubernetes, which can be more complex and requires a deeper understanding of Kubernetes concepts for successful deployments. 

While EKS offers powerful features, it may require more experience and expertise to fully leverage its capabilities, especially when configuring and managing the Kubernetes control plane.

Also Read: Everything You Need to Know About Kubernetes Namespaces

EKS vs ECS: Community Support

EKS benefits from Kubernetes's widespread popularity and extensive community support. 

Being an open-source platform, Kubernetes has garnered a large and active community of users and contributors. This results in a wealth of resources, documentation, how-to guides, and best practices available to users. 

The vibrant community ensures ample support and knowledge-sharing for troubleshooting, learning, and exploring advanced use cases. 

On the other hand, while ECS may not have the same level of community support as Kubernetes, it enjoys strong official support from AWS. AWS provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources specific to ECS, ensuring users can access official guidance and assistance.

Use Cases of EKS and ECS

Use Cases of EKS

EKS is the ideal choice to deploy and manage complex, large-scale applications. It provides robust capabilities for running Kubernetes clusters, allowing you to leverage the power of Kubernetes for efficient container orchestration and scaling. 

If you require support for the Kubernetes API or need to migrate existing workloads seamlessly, EKS is the perfect fit. 

It also excels in managing applications across multiple infrastructures, whether on-premises, hybrid, or in the cloud, making it a flexible solution for organizations with diverse environments. 

With EKS, you can take advantage of the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of Kubernetes, ensuring optimal resource utilization and scalability for your containerized applications.

Also Read: Best Practices for Hybrid Cloud Security

Use Cases of ECS

ECS is ideal when you need a simple and easy-to-use solution for deploying and managing applications. 

It offers seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem, making it a convenient option if you already work extensively with AWS services. 

ECS eliminates the need to invest time and resources in learning Kubernetes, making it suitable for organizations with limited expertise in container orchestration. 

With its streamlined approach, ECS allows you to quickly build, deploy, and migrate containerized applications within the AWS environment. 

It provides deep integration with AWS services like IAM, VPC, and CloudWatch, enabling efficient resource provisioning, access control, and monitoring. If simplicity and deep AWS integration are your priorities, ECS is the perfect choice for your container deployment needs.

Humalect CTA Banner, ECS vs EKS

Summary of Differences: ECS vs EKS





Choice of orchestrators

Built on Kubernetes, extensive features

Cost Comparison

ECS is generally slightly more cost-effective compared to EKS. 

EKS is slightly higher in terms of cost compared to ECS. However,


Maximum of 120 tasks per instance

Up to 750 Pods per instance

Cluster Management

Simplified management, AWS integration

Leveraging the power of Kubernetes


Horizontal scaling, integration with AWS Auto Scaling

Scaling through Kubernetes' pod management

State of Containerization

Widely used, strong AWS support

Popular due to the Kubernetes ecosystem

Ease of Use & Community Support

User-friendly, official AWS support

Extensive community support for Kubernetes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between the ECS task and the EKS pod?

ECS tasks represent sets of containers scheduled together, while EKS pods are deployment units for containers within a Kubernetes cluster.

Should I migrate from ECS to EKS?

If you want advanced features, tighter integration with the Kubernetes ecosystem, or existing workloads built on Kubernetes, migrating to EKS may be beneficial. However, if you have a simple setup, are satisfied with ECS's functionality, and don't want to invest time in learning Kubernetes, sticking with ECS could be the right choice.

What is the difference between ECS and Elastic Beanstalk?

ECS is a container orchestration service that provides more control and flexibility in managing containerized applications. Elastic Beanstalk is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) that abstracts away infrastructure management and simplifies application deployment.

What is the difference between Amazon Elastic Container Service ECS and Amazon Elastic Container Registry?

Amazon ECS is a container orchestration service that helps you deploy and manage containers at scale, while Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry for storing, managing, and deploying container images.

What is the difference between EKS, ECS, and Fargate?

EKS is a managed Kubernetes service, ECS is a container orchestration service offering a choice of orchestrators, and Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers, eliminating the need to manage infrastructure.