Docker has been a top choice for containerized applications for years. However, a new contender has emerged on the scene - Podman. With its promise of improved security and seamless integration with Kubernetes, it's time to ask the question: Docker or Podman? In this blog, we delve into the key differences between these two container engines and help you make an informed choice in 2023.

docker vs podman banner, podman vs docker

Containerization has completely revolutionized the way we develop, deploy, and scale applications. It's an exciting time in the tech industry, with Docker and Podman emerging as two powerful container engines.

Docker has been a frontrunner in the containerization space for quite some time. Its widespread adoption and strong community support have solidified its position as a go-to platform. 

With Docker, you can expect a reliable and battle-tested solution with a proven track record.

On the other hand, Podman is a newer player that brings its own set of advantages to the table. It emphasizes advanced security features, ensuring that your containers are well-protected. 

Additionally, Podman seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes, making it an attractive choice for those looking to leverage container orchestration.

Now, if you're wondering which one is the right fit for your specific needs, you're in the right place. 

In this blog, we'll dive into the definitions, features, and differences of Docker and Podman. 

Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to make an informed decision in today's fast-paced and ever-evolving technological landscape.

But first - why containerization?

Humalect CTA banner, Docker vs podman, podman vs docker banner

Importance of Containerization

This section is not "news" but we wanted to revisit this to set up a foundation for what's ahead in the blog. You can skip this section if you are already ahead in your container journey.

Simplified Development and Deployment

Containerization, showcased by Docker and Podman, simplifies application packaging by creating a standardized approach. 

It wraps applications with their dependencies, like libraries and configurations, into containers for consistent performance across different environments. 

This solves the "works on my machine" problem, streamlines development, and eases application deployment on various platforms.

Portability and Scalability

Containers bring both portability and scalability to applications. They provide a convenient way to package an application and its dependencies, making it easy to move them across different environments like development, testing, and production. 

This portability promotes collaboration among developers, system administrators, and operations teams.

Additionally, containers enable applications to handle increased workloads by quickly and efficiently spinning up additional instancesThis horizontal scaling ensures that your application can scale smoothly as the demand grows. 

With containers, you can enjoy a streamlined development process and simplified deployment across various platforms.

Efficient Resource Utilization

Containerization is a smart way to make the most of system resources. 

Unlike traditional virtualization, where each virtual machine requires its own operating system, containers take a different approach. They share the host system's operating system kernel.

This shared kernel approach has some amazing benefits. 

First of all, it reduces overhead and improves performance. With containers, you don't have the extra burden of running multiple operating systems. This means applications can run faster and more efficiently.

By sharing the kernel, containers also allow us to have more applications running on a single server. It's like maximizing the use of our resources and getting the most out of what we have.

Isolation and Security

Containers provide strong isolation between applications and the underlying infrastructure, and thus, enhancing security. 

Each container operates in its isolated environment, preventing interference with other applications or the host system.

Additionally, container images can be built from a trusted base, ensuring the application starts from a known and secure state. 

As microservices and distributed architectures gain popularity, containerization establishes clear security boundaries and simplifies the management of security policies.

Also Read: Best Practices for Microservices Monitoring and Testing

DevOps Enablement

With containers, developers can package their applications and all the necessary stuff they depend on. It's like putting everything in a nice little box. 

And the best part? 

This box can be deployed consistently and reliably across different environments. No more worrying about things behaving differently in development, testing, or production. It's all smooth sailing.

By using containerization tools like Docker and Podman, development teams can ensure that their applications work like a charm no matter where they're deployed. It's like having a guarantee that things will run smoothly.

What is Docker?

Docker is a fantastic tool for developers that makes deploying applications a breeze. It does this by using containers, which are like little packages that contain everything an application needs to run smoothly. 

These containers include the code, runtime, system tools, libraries, and dependencies, so you don't have to worry about compatibility issues when moving your application between different environments.

Let's break down the key components of Docker.

Docker Engine

Docker Engine is the core of the Docker platform and handles all the container management tasks. With Docker Engine, you can create, run, and share containers on a single server or across multiple machines, forming a cluster. It's the powerhouse behind the scenes.

Docker Images

Think of Docker Images as the building blocks for containers. An image is a lightweight and self-contained package that contains everything your application needs to run. 

It's like a snapshot of your application, complete with the code, runtime, system tools, and libraries. You create these images using a special configuration file called a Dockerfile, which tells Docker how to build the image.

Docker Containers

Docker Containers are the running instances of Docker Images. Each container is an isolated environment that operates independently of other containers and the host system. 

They provide a consistent and reproducible execution environment for your application, ensuring that it runs the same way no matter where it's deployed.

Also Read: A Complete List of Docker Commands

How Does Docker Work?

Docker is all about packaging applications and their dependencies in containers. 

Instead of dealing with entire operating systems like virtual machines, Docker containers share the underlying OS, making them lightweight and efficient. 

It's like having little self-contained units that can run your code anywhere.

Docker images are like ready-to-go packages that include everything needed to run your code smoothly. 

They're super portable, so you can move them around different Docker environments without any hiccups as long as the underlying OS matches. 

And it's not just limited to Linux anymore – Docker has expanded its support to include Windows and macOS too. They even have versions specifically designed for popular cloud platforms like AWS and Azure.

This approach has revolutionized how we deploy and manage applications. Docker has become a go-to choice for containerization because of its simplicity, flexibility, and wide adoption in the industry.

Also Read: How to Migrate from AWS to Azure?

What is Podman?

Podman, the open-source container engine, is a powerful alternative to Docker. It offers lightweight and secure containerization without a central daemon. 

With rootless mode, non-root users can run containers securely. 

Podman integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes, simplifying pod management. It supports various container image formats, including Docker images. 

Podman provides enhanced security, effortless Kubernetes integration, and compatibility with different container image types.

How does Podman Work?

Podman takes a different approach compared to Docker when it comes to its architecture. Instead of relying on a centralized daemon process, Podman operates as a daemonless container engine. 

This means that each Podman command runs independently within its own process, simplifying container management and reducing potential points of failure. It's like having more flexibility and control at your fingertips.

One standout feature of Podman is its rootless mode, which allows non-root users to securely run containers. 

By leveraging Linux security features and user namespaces, Podman ensures that container operations are isolated and don't require elevated privileges. This helps mitigate potential risks and adds an extra layer of security to your container environment.

Another advantage of Podman is its seamless integration with Kubernetes. With Podman, you can easily create and manage Kubernetes-compatible pods. These pods are groups of containers that work together, sharing resources and communicating with each other.

Humalect CTA banner, podman vs docker, docker vs podman banner

Podman vs Docker: The Ultimate Comparison 


When it comes to performance, both Podman and Docker have their own strengths that cater to different needs.

Podman, with its clever architecture, really shines in terms of resource usage and how quickly it starts up containers. It directly runs commands, which means containers start up faster and there's less overhead. 

This lightweight approach is perfect for scenarios where you need containers to start up quickly and consume minimal resources. Think edge computing or microservices.

On the other hand, Docker has its own advantages. It has a centralized daemon that caches frequently used images, so subsequent container starts are faster. 

Plus, Docker has a well-established ecosystem and a wide range of tools. It provides smooth workflows and integrates easily with existing Docker-based infrastructure.

So, which one should you choose for better performance? 

It depends on your specific workload. 

If you really value fast startup and efficient resource usage, Podman's approach is a winner. 

But if you're already invested in Docker's ecosystem or if you have an established infrastructure, sticking with Docker might make more sense.


Podman has a really cool feature called the fork-exec architecture that adds an extra layer of security. 

It continuously keeps an eye on system files, making it easy to accurately track any user modifications. This makes audit logging a breeze, enhancing traceability and compliance. 

Another great thing about Podman is its rootless containers. They provide efficient access control, so administrators can grant specific user privileges. This means they can securely manage critical server components.

On the other hand, Docker has its own way of ensuring secure running. It uses a client-server architecture that allows for straightforward implementation of security practices. 

One of Docker's key recommendations is to avoid running containers in privileged mode. 

Docker also leverages powerful security measures like SELinux, AppArmor, and GRSEC, which greatly enhance container security.

Both Podman and Docker prioritize security, but their approaches have some differences. 


Podman has got you covered when it comes to networking! It provides a flexible and user-friendly experience that makes managing container connectivity a breeze. 

You can create your own custom networks and easily control how containers connect to them. 

With Podman, you can define network namespaces and assign containers to specific networks, giving you precise control over communication and isolation. This is especially handy when you're dealing with complex network setups or multi-container applications.

On the other hand, Docker offers a comprehensive networking model with some neat built-in features. It has bridge networks, which allow containers on the same host to talk to each other. 

And if you need to communicate across multiple hosts, Docker's got you covered with overlay networks. Docker also lets you map container ports, so you can access container services from external systems.

Market Share

When it comes to market share, Docker has been ruling the containerization game for quite a while now. It quickly became the go-to solution for deploying and managing containers, and it gained a huge following in the developer community. 

Docker's extensive ecosystem, impressive feature set, and strong support from its community played a big role in its widespread adoption by developers, businesses, and cloud providers.

Podman may be a relative newcomer, but it's been making some waves and challenging Docker's dominance. People are really drawn to Podman's lightweight and daemonless architecture, which means it doesn't hog up your system resources. 

Plus, Podman takes security seriously and offers some cool features to keep your containers safe. It's also super easy to integrate with Kubernetes, which is a big deal in the world of container orchestration.

Also Read: How to Create & Manage Kubernetes Clusters using Kubeadm?


Podman uses Linux user namespaces to create a strong isolation mechanism. It's like putting each container in its own little bubble, keeping them separate and secure. 

So even if you're not the root user, you can still enjoy the benefits of containerization without worrying about potential risks. 

Plus, with this fine-grained access control, you can manage who gets to do what with your containers.

Now, let's talk about Docker

By default, Docker takes a different approach. It does require root privileges to manage containers and do container-related stuff. But don't fret! Docker has got your back too. 

It offers options for running containers in a rootless mode, just like Podman. This means non-root users can also run containers securely. It might need a bit of extra configuration and setup, but hey, it's worth it for that added security.

So, whether you're using Podman or Docker, security is a priority. Podman's rootless architecture gives you that extra peace of mind, making sure your containers stay contained within their own little world. 

And Docker has options for running containers without root privileges, so you can keep things secure even there.

Building Images

Docker has gained popularity for its strong ecosystem and well-established image-building process. 

It relies on Dockerfiles, which are text files that provide step-by-step instructions for creating images. 

This approach ensures consistency and reproducibility, allowing developers to define exactly how they want their images to be built.

On the other hand, Podman takes a slightly different approach by utilizing Buildah, a dedicated tool for building OCI-compliant images. 

Buildah offers a command-line interface that gives developers more control over the image construction process. It allows them to start from scratch or modify existing images as needed.

The great thing is that both Podman and Docker support building images from Dockerfiles. This means you can easily migrate your existing projects between the two tools without much hassle.

Also Read: How to Perform Docker Cleanup?


Podman's architecture is designed to be lightweight and efficient, resulting in fast container runtimes. 

When you run Podman commands, they execute directly within their processes, leading to quick container startup times. 

This makes Podman a great choice for situations where you need containers to be deployed rapidly and be highly responsive. 

For example, it's ideal for agile development workflows or scenarios where you need to scale applications on demand.

On the other hand, Docker has a different architecture with a centralized daemon. 

While the initial startup of a Docker container may take a bit longer due to the daemon initialization process, the subsequent container starts to benefit from image caching and optimized resource usage. 

Docker's extensive ecosystem is also a significant advantage, providing efficient container management capabilities and enabling seamless orchestration and streamlined workflows.

Humalect CTA banner, podman vs docker, docker vs podman

Differences between Docker & Podman: Summary





Offers fast container starts and resource efficiency

Benefits from a centralized daemon and optimized resource usage


Strong focus on security with rootless containers

Provides secure running and supports additional security measures 


Flexible networking with custom networks and fine-grained control

Comprehensive networking model with bridge and overlay networks

Market Share

Rising in popularity as a viable alternative to Docker

Established as the dominant player in the containerization market


Rootless execution, enhanced security with user namespaces

Default execution with root privileges offers rootless mode options

Building Images

Leverages Buildah for building OCI-compliant images

Utilizes Dockerfiles for declarative and reproducible image builds


Lightweight and fast container runtime

Optimized performance with image caching and extensive tooling

Also Read: What are Init Containers in Kubernetes?

Frequently Asked Questions 

How is Podman different from Docker?

Podman serves as a lightweight and daemonless alternative to Docker, offering a rootless execution mode and seamless integration with Kubernetes.

Should I use Docker or Podman?

The choice between Docker and Podman depends on your specific needs and preferences. Docker has a well-established ecosystem and widespread adoption, making it suitable for many use cases. 

On the other hand, Podman provides a lightweight and secure alternative, appealing to users seeking entahanced control and rootless execution.